Yogyakarta Government admitted breaking rules as local journalists and civil society found irregularities

Bhekti Suryani, a Harian Jogja journalist, smiled with satisfaction as she found out Gatot Saptadi bans the Regional Government Organizations of Yogyakarta Province from using quick tender method without careful consideration. Gatot, who at that time still served as the Regional Secretary of Yogyakarta Province, admitted that the quick tender method used in the first phase of a construction project of a trade center for Malioboro street vendors violated the rules.

Monitoring Government’s Procurement Projects with OpenTender

On 25 June 2018, the Coordinating Ministry of Political, Law and Human Rights inaugurated their newly renovated media center. The building now has several floors and additional workspace for the Illegal Levy Eradication Task Force and special bureau for Papua.

Implementing Open Contracting in Indonesia

Indonesia already has a Law on Public Information Disclosure Number 14 of 2008 which provides everyone the right to access information managed by the government. This law also requires the government to be transparent and to publish their information.

UNCAC Coalition Statement on threats to the independence of Indonesia’s Corruption Eradication Commission KPK

We, the undersigning civil society organisations, have been monitoring developments in Indonesia regarding the revision of the law governing Indonesia’s anti-corruption agency, the Corruption Eradication Commission or locally known as Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK).

We share the grave concerns of Indonesia’s leading civil society corruption watchdog groups regarding the implications of recent amendments to the KPK law, which endanger the anti-corruption agency’s independence and undermine its ability to effectively prevent, investigate and prosecute corruption.

Trends of Corruption Verdicts 2018
Since 2005, ICW routinely monitors and collects corruption sentences, from the Corruption Courts , the High Courts, Military Courts, to the Supreme Court, including appeals and reviews to the Supreme Court. Through this monitoring, we can identify the frequent actors, the most severe court ruling for corruptors, the average court ruling for corruptors, and the potential state losses of corruption cases that have been successfully monitored.
Annual Report ICW 2018
At the outset we must apologize for the late appearance of the 2018 end-of-year report of Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW). Normally we go to press by March each year at the latest, coinciding with the publication of the audit report on ICW’s finances for the year in question.
 
The delay this time was not due to considerations relating to the audit, but rather because of two important issues confronting ICW. Firstly, 2018 was the final year of ICW’s strategic plan which had been in place since 2014.
ICW Financial Audit 2018

Laporan Keuangan ICW 2018

Battling Corruption in Indonesia’s Elections
While the vote was largely free and fair, there are issues that Indonesian authorities must address before the next election.
 
On April 17, Indonesia, the world’s third-largest democracy, held the biggest and most-complex single-day elections in world history: 193 million registered voters, 20,500 candidates, and 800,000 polling booths.
TPPR Public Procurement Assessment and Recommendations in Indonesia

Recommendations

Introduction

Inequality exacerbates corruption by elites

Corruption and economic inequality are like a vicious circle. Both have a significant impact on each other. Unfortunately, growing discourse on corruption and its eradication rarely mention economic inequality as a crucial issue.

Indonesia Corruption Watch recorded 454 corruption cases in 2018. A survey by Transparency International in 2018 ranked Indonesia 89th on the corruption perception index, much worse than neighboring countries such as Malaysia ( 61 ), Singapore (3) and Brunei Darussalam ( 31 ).

Subscribe to Subscribe to